Contact Us on the WhatsApp icon to send us a message or email

The Vladimir Putin Interview

Recent News

The next 3 minutes will transform your life forever.

Get our free News Emails on latest articles, alerts and solutions for both legal templates and ways to help fight back against the Globalists vax Mandates , and health resources to boost your immune system and ways to Protect from deadly EMF 5G radiation and more.


Australian National Review - News with a Difference!

How you can advertise on

Help us help defend free speech and save democracy from the World Economic Forum planned Totalitarian Great Reset. and help us expose the Covid Fraudsters

U.S. House Judiciary Committee reveals Brazilian judge’s decisions targeting Elon Musk’s X platform


Dozens of decisions made by Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, related to his targeting of Elon Musk’s social media platform X, have been made public despite the judge’s efforts to keep them secret.

The House Judiciary Committee revealed the decisions in a 541-page staff report, obtained through committee subpoenas involving X, the Associated Press reported Friday.

According to investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger, Justice de Moraes had demanded permanent bans on at least 150 X profiles belonging to elected officials and journalists.

Shellenberger raised concerns that these demands for bans may constitute electoral interference, given the dependence of elected leaders on social media.

He wrote:

Given the dependence of elected leaders on social media, these demands for bans may constitute electoral interference. In one case, De Moraes demanded that all major social media platforms, including at least one, Twitter, which did not publish the offending material, ban a federal Congressman, Marcel Van Hattem. The TSE had claimed that Van Hattem had criticized the election results. Not only had Van Hattan’s video not been related to the elections, but it was also a criticism of the Labor Department. It was released one day before the election.

X’s decision to comply with U.S. law and respond to the House Judiciary Committee has drawn mixed reactions. Carlos Affonso, director of the nonprofit Institute of Technology and Society, accused Musk of inventing “a new form of non-compliance of a court order, through an intermediary,” by revealing the documents through a third party.

The revelations are particularly significant given that approximately 40 million Brazilians, or about 18% of the population, access X at least once per month, according to market research group eMarketer.

The controversy began earlier this month when de Moraes ordered X to block certain accounts. Musk initially stated he would defy the court’s order once his employees were in a “safe place” where they could not be arrested. In response, de Moraes issued a decision accusing Musk of obstruction of justice and incitement to crime. On April 13, X’s legal representative in Brazil informed de Moraes that they would comply with all court orders.

Source link

Related News

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The ANR to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…